03Data product · Platform economics

Turning platform telemetry into decisions leaders could act on.

Usage, observability, and chargeback capabilities that converted operational data into financial clarity and roadmap evidence.

RoleL1/L2 Product Owner
Timeline2022—Present
Scale~200K devices

The narrative is sanitized and figures are approximate. Screens and underlying data cannot be shared because they belong to a regulated enterprise environment.

Who it served

Platform leaders, finance partners, service owners, and engineering teams deciding where to simplify the estate, correct billing, and direct investment.

My contribution

Defined the decisions the data product needed to support, prioritized reporting and chargeback capabilities, and connected platform telemetry to financial and lifecycle action.

The product problem

Platform decisions were constrained by fragmented reporting, vendor dependency, and billing data that did not always reflect real usage. Leaders needed evidence they could trust before simplifying the estate.

How I approached it
01

Replaced third-party reporting with an in-house observability capability built around the platform's actual decision needs.

02

Created usage and chargeback views that made exceptions, waste, and lifecycle opportunities visible.

03

Used the evidence to shape decommissioning, vendor conversations, cost allocation, and roadmap priorities.

Key decisions
01

Begin with a decision inventory

Identified the recurring decisions leaders could not make confidently—billing corrections, contract choices, lifecycle actions, and service exceptions—before defining views.

02

Replace vendor dependency selectively

Built in-house capability where control, economics, and decision relevance justified ownership rather than recreating every feature of the external tool.

03

Design for actionability

Made exceptions, ownership, and next actions visible so insight could move into financial correction, decommissioning, and roadmap work.

The trade-off

The tension was analytical breadth versus trusted action. The first priority was a smaller set of governed measures leaders could use repeatedly, rather than a large catalogue of metrics with uncertain lineage.

How success was measured

The product was measured through billing accuracy, savings enabled, devices made visible, decision turnaround, adoption by stakeholder teams, and the actions generated from the evidence.

Selected outcomes
8.5→4.1%invalid billing reduced
~$2Mcontract savings enabled
200Kendpoints made visible
What this work demonstrates

The product signals behind the result.

  • Data product strategy
  • Platform economics
  • Metric design
  • Build-versus-buy
  • Stakeholder influence
What I learned
A dashboard is not a data product unless it changes a decision. Starting from the decision—not the available data—kept the work focused on value.